Alibaba: record fine means more spending on corporate good deeds - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
阿里巴巴

Alibaba: record fine means more spending on corporate good deeds

Ecommerce group will have to continue working hard to remain in Beijing’s good books
00:00

Beijing’s most aggressive fine on record has had the discordant effect of lifting Alibaba shares 8 per cent on Monday. The Rmb18.2bn ($2.8bn) penalty is the culmination of an antitrust investigation into the Chinese ecommerce giant that began in December. Yet any optimism that this marks the end of the probe is premature.

True, the company can comfortably cover the costs. Alibaba has about Rmb312bn in cash and equivalents. The fine is equal to about 4 per cent of domestic sales in 2019. Furthermore, it is less than half the 10 per cent penalty possible under Chinese law. By international standards, it is not a record breaker either. In 2018, the EU imposed a $5bn fine against Google.

But the full repercussions are not yet clear. Regulators have voiced concerns around Alibaba’s non-core businesses. Divestments cannot be ruled out. Previous acquisitions are still being scrutinised too. In order to remain in Beijing’s good books, Alibaba will have to boost spending on corporate good deeds and services that support small businesses in rural regions, such as Taobao Deals. Profit growth, already slowing, will fall back.

Alibaba shares trade at 20 times March 2022 earnings, less than a third the level of rivals such as Amazon. The valuation discount with global peers will grow as it continues to wrestle with regulators. In a statement about the fine, Alibaba said it was “full of gratitude and respect” for the government’s regulation and critical oversight. Local tech giants know that maintaining dominant positions lies in the hands of the state.

For the broader Chinese tech sector, Alibaba’s fine marks a new era of expensive supervision. Tencent and Baidu, the country’s dominant social media and search companies, are likely to be the government’s next targets. Equivalent fines would be more difficult for the pair to cover financially. Tencent’s 2019 revenues were similar to Alibaba’s but it has only half the cash and equivalents. Baidu has about a tenth.

Both Tencent and Baidu have notably dominant positions. Baidu controls more than three-quarters of the local search engine market. Tencent has almost 40 per cent of the payments market and about two-thirds of local game distribution.

Such success now comes at a cost. China’s central bank is considering a plan to set up joint ventures with local companies to oversee consumer data, which give big companies their competitive edge. Tech leaders can only suffer if Beijing continues to support small rivals.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

德国军队难以让Z世代新兵‘做好战争准备’

德国联邦国防军的退伍率很高,国内出于良心拒服兵役者的人数不断增加。

跨大西洋裂痕的光明面

从文化角度来看,欧洲和美国之间的联系减少并不是最坏的事情。

美国如何将世界经济武器化

两本书描绘了华盛顿如何依赖其经济实力和美元的主导地位,来应对流氓国家和地缘政治对手。

法官阻止特朗普利用战时法律驱逐委内瑞拉人

批评者表示,鲜有使用的权力可能会扩大在没有正当程序情况下拘留和驱逐人员的权力。

塞勒的策略:逢高买入,大力推动

比特币的首席炒作者正在测试公共市场监管的界限。

斯塔默称乌克兰支持者的停火计划进入“行动阶段”

“自愿联盟”将于周四再次举行会议,讨论如何保证停火。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×