The wider risks in SoftBank’s US tech bet | 软银的豪赌 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

The wider risks in SoftBank’s US tech bet
软银的豪赌

The Japanese group’s options trade highlights the dangers of the market rally
这家日本巨头的期权交易凸显了市场反弹中蕴含的危险。
00:00

There are few business people who profess to have a plan for the next three years, let alone the next 300. Masayoshi Son, the Japanese entrepreneur behind SoftBank, wants his company to last that long, a goal that is meant to underpin the investments made by his $100bn Vision Fund. So the unmasking of SoftBank as the mystery “whale” whose options trading appears to have helped drive US technology stocks to record highs is a surprise — this type of trading appears at odds with the self-professed strategic nature of SoftBank’s investments. The revelation has, rightly, fuelled concerns that far from acting like a visionary technology investor, the group is behaving like a hedge fund. 

Whatever the exact details of SoftBank’s equity derivatives trade, the key question is whether the wider market cares. The answer is yes. Aside from the general curiosity — and sometimes mockery — that SoftBank attracts in the industry, investors and regulators should be alert to the consequences of one large, determined investor being able — at least in part — to influence the world’s largest, most liquid and most scrutinised stock market. 

Even before the identification of SoftBank, there were concerns that the US market was defying fundamentals, and that the one-sided rally in US technology stocks was unsustainable. Trading volumes on Nasdaq, where most of the big tech stocks are listed, are double what they were before the pandemic. Monetary stimulus by central banks in response to the pandemic have helped to propel equity markets higher. The retail trading boom, as day traders have turned to online trading platforms such as Robinhood, has also driven much of the activity, both in equities and derivatives. 

This surge of activity in the options markets is what makes some investors nervous. Financial institutions, advisers and regulators should be alert to the dangers of unsophisticated investors putting their money — or, even worse, borrowed money — to invest in higher-risk trades such as derivatives. In the event of a downturn, there is a possibility that some investors will lose their shirts, leading to real economic pain just as the downturn caused by the coronavirus pandemic bites.

In the case of SoftBank, its heavy bet on derivatives has done little to damp fears that the group has lost its strategic focus — even if it had already announced it would be setting up an asset management unit for public investments. It bears remembering that Japan’s corporate history is peppered with examples of companies and retail investors betting heavily on derivatives and getting burnt.

Many companies’ problems also often start when they have an excess of funds to deploy; the ill-fated foray of Germany’s Landesbanken into US subprime mortgages was triggered, in part, by a search for ways to invest a cash surplus. In the case of SoftBank, its recent tech investments were partly funded by cash from its $41bn asset disposal programme.

Some investors are already fearful of a market crash. Coronavirus looked like it had decisively ended the American equity market’s record bull run; its Lazarus-like revival in the past few months has only heightened the air of unreality. Previous market tumbles have normally had a tipping point, however small relative to the correction that followed. The recent drop in the valuations of tech stocks may have been enough to take some of the heat out of the market for now but a concern must be that SoftBank could be the snowflake that starts the avalanche.  

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:铸犁为剑——给欧洲工业吹响的战斗号角

在重整军备的推动下,汽车制造商迎来了革新其生产线的又一次机遇。

为何仍应看多黄金?

库珀:尽管这种贵金属在中东战争期间遭到抛售,但其前景仍更为乐观。

试图摆脱对微软依赖的德国联邦州

在各国领导人日益主张欧洲减少对美国科技巨头的依赖之际,追求“数字主权”的努力使得石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州成为欧洲的一块“试验田”。

FT社评:价格管制重返主流令人不安

价格管制虽然能带来短期纾困,但也会衍生新的问题。与其关注价格管制,各国政府不如把重点放在提高生产率上。

元首关系紧张,美英安全合作出现裂痕

英美围绕伊朗战争出现分歧,正在冲击两国外交人员、官员以及军方人员之间的工作关系。

FT社评:全球贸易保卫战中的“中间力量缺位”

有关取代美国、寻找多边体系之锚的讨论没有得出什么实际成果。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×