Former CIA operative: regime change in Iran is much harder than the US thinks - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

Former CIA operative: regime change in Iran is much harder than the US thinks

Covert action can help topple a leader but it rarely builds legitimacy
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":9.38,"text":"The writer is a former CIA operative with deep exposure in the Middle East"}],[{"start":15.57,"text":"The United States and Israel have done significant damage to Iran’s military and security apparatus. Senior commanders have been killed at a pace rarely seen in modern warfare. "}],[{"start":27.85,"text":"The regime’s sense of impunity has been shaken. These are real achievements. But the Islamic republic remains what it has long been: a regime that is brutal at home and destabilising abroad."}],[{"start":41.8,"text":"Military success should not be confused with political transformation. That is the dilemma now confronting Washington and its regional allies: how to exploit battlefield gains without falling into the familiar illusion that pressure alone can produce regime change. "}],[{"start":59.98,"text":"After 26 years in operations with the CIA, including helping lead sizeable covert action programmes, my experience tells me there is no silver bullet here — least of all in covert action."}],[{"start":73.97999999999999,"text":"What some foreign-policy theorists miss is that political culture cannot be redesigned from the air, and human nature cannot be remade from a conference room in Washington. The question now is whether we understand Iran well enough to influence its fracture without owning the collapse."}],[{"start":93.30999999999999,"text":"Most serious observers already understand that uncomfortable truth. The prospects for immediate political change in Tehran remain slim. As the scholar Karim Sadjadpour has observed, the Revolutionary Guard and military are seeking to ensure regime survival because it is in their economic interest. Even after military setbacks, the regime’s core instruments of coercion remain intact enough to shape succession and survival."}],[{"start":121.64999999999999,"text":"America’s Gulf partners, especially the UAE, have no interest in being left across the water from a wounded animal. A prolonged war would raise the costs sharply: repeated missile and drone threats, disruption to shipping and insurance through the Strait of Hormuz, pressure on investor confidence in Abu Dhabi and Dubai, and the latent risk of Iranian proxy or covert retaliation on Emirati soil. "}],[{"start":149.34,"text":"The UAE’s leaders know that when the sorties end and the headlines move on, they will still face the consequences. Their concern is not only whether the Islamic republic survives, but whether it survives angry, cornered, and even more dependent on asymmetric retaliation. "}],[{"start":169.22,"text":"For our part, the US intelligence community will need to be vigilant and resourced sufficiently so as to deal with a return to a cold war with the Islamic republic that could involve lethal operations directed at American officials."}],[{"start":185.86,"text":"That is why the United States should resist the temptation to move beyond President Donald Trump’s stated aims, which could lead us to slide into an open-ended campaign for regime change. The danger is not merely mission creep. It is the risk of a truly regional war. "}],[{"start":204.64000000000001,"text":"For more than a generation, some US policymakers have believed the Middle East could be fixed, reordered, or remade through force and political engineering. That conceit has failed repeatedly because it misunderstands how power actually works in the region."}],[{"start":222.72000000000003,"text":"That is particularly relevant when discussing alternatives to the current regime. There is no cohesive opposition prepared to take the reins. The Iranian diaspora is fractured. The Mujahideen-e-Khalq, or MEK — an exiled opposition group with controversial internal practices and little credibility inside Iran — is not a viable vehicle for legitimacy. "}],[{"start":246.96000000000004,"text":"Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s last shah and the best-known monarchist figure in exile, remains the most recognisable opposition name abroad, and that should be acknowledged. "}],[{"start":259.34000000000003,"text":"He may yet emerge as a genuine champion of the Iranian people, but prominence is not the same as power and he does not yet command the loyalty of the security or military institutions that would determine any serious transition."}],[{"start":275.33000000000004,"text":"Washington should also avoid squandering whatever goodwill remains among ordinary Iranians who distinguish between their rulers and the outside world. In conducting military operations, the US takes tremendous care to minimise risk to civilians. That is why the investigation into the bombing of the school in Minab should be allowed to run its course. If it is ultimately determined that the United States was responsible, Washington should acknowledge the mistake and apologise. That is both morally right and strategically wise."}],[{"start":313.31000000000006,"text":"History offers sobering lessons when it comes to covert action. It has in some cases contributed to regime change: the 1953 CIA-British coup in Iran that removed Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, and the 1954 US-backed overthrow of Jacobo Árbenz in Guatemala. But those episodes also reveal the limits. "}],[{"start":337.6000000000001,"text":"Covert action can help topple a leader. It rarely builds legitimacy, institutions or a durable political order. And the consequences — backlash, repression, instability or long-term anti-American grievance — can arrive years later."}],[{"start":356.2000000000001,"text":"The wiser course is strategic patience: continue for a time to degrade the regime’s lethal capabilities, but dial down the bombing at the earliest opportunity so as not to harden civilian sentiment or squander goodwill. Above all, Washington should continue to consult closely with Gulf allies who will be left to manage the consequences long after the kinetic phase ends."}],[{"start":382.5300000000001,"text":"Iran may yet change. In fact, this is likely. But history suggests it is far easier for the United States to weaken this regime than to shape what comes next."}],[{"start":407.0000000000001,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1775351263_3591.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普如何成了科技界的“首席监管者”

他在该领域的干预力度已超出欧盟所做的一切。

战争会对美国通胀产生多大影响?

伊朗战争会推高中国的通胀吗?欧元区零售销售会否进一步加剧欧元的压力?

欧尔班在匈牙利面临选举清算

这位民粹右派总理一旦败选,其影响将波及整个欧洲。

美军营救在伊朗上空被击落的第二名F-15E战斗机飞行员

特朗普称赞那名在地面滞留逾24小时的武器系统军官获救。

滞胀担忧重创英国楼市信心

整个板块的股价都在遭受重挫。

AI股票上涨400%助推香港IPO创5年新高

交易积压与更严的质量监管正把一些科技公司推回中国内地上市。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×