The big challenge for Europe’s investment banks: pick a lane | 欧洲投资银行面临的重大挑战:选择一条赛道。 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

The big challenge for Europe’s investment banks: pick a lane
欧洲投资银行面临的重大挑战:选择一条赛道。

There are a lot of ways to make money in investment banking, the mistake is to keep making U-turns
在投资银行业中有很多赚钱的方法,错误在于不断地转向。
00:00

European investment banks have spent years debating the best path to profits. Recent results suggest many roads can work — the more important thing is to pick a lane and stay in it.

BNP Paribas has become the standard-bearer for the traditional investment banker’s argument: large corporates will be more loyal to banks that can be a one-stop shop. A European bank might never be fighting Goldman Sachs for the lead role on a US tech IPO, but it should at least be part of the team when its French client wants to do a secondary listing in New York.

Santander is following suit in trying to build up its investment bank, particularly in the US. Both reported stronger than expected financial results this week.

undefined

HSBC’s new chief executive Georges Elhedery is following a different track, abandoning underperforming businesses such as advising on mergers in Europe and the US. Elhedery is betting that clients know what HSBC is good at: a company that wants to sell stock in Dubai isn’t going to drop HSBC just because it doesn’t have enough M&A bankers in New York.

Backers of the HSBC approach point to the success of American boutiques such as Evercore and PJT Partners — they make no pretence of covering everything, but shares have outperformed full-service players on both sides of the Atlantic over the past few years.

But maybe there is a different lesson to take from the boutiques: they know their role, and, broadly speaking, have stuck to it. There are a lot of ways to make money in investment banking; the mistake is to keep making U-turns then wondering why you haven’t reached the right destination.

HSBC has spent years flip flopping, while Barclays’ attitude has shifted with each chief executive. Deutsche Bank at one point managed five different “strategic plans” in seven years.

Contrast BNP, where Jean-Laurent Bonnafé has been in charge for more than 13 years. It was traditionally strong in fixed income, but decided to start building out its equities business in 2016; those efforts have paid off recently, but it took a long time. Investment bank revenues have grown six years in a row — a feat none of its rivals have matched.

undefined

Deutsche’s turnaround only really began when Christian Sewing convinced investors the group was genuinely committed to a major overhaul — including shedding its equities trading business. Barclays has settled on a very different strategy, but has likewise been rewarded by investors for a perception of stability under chief CS Venkatakrishnan after years of back and forth.

Elhedery has acted quickly since taking charge of HSBC last autumn. Decisive moves in either direction are a good start — the challenge will be to stick with them.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:铸犁为剑——给欧洲工业吹响的战斗号角

在重整军备的推动下,汽车制造商迎来了革新其生产线的又一次机遇。

为何仍应看多黄金?

库珀:尽管这种贵金属在中东战争期间遭到抛售,但其前景仍更为乐观。

试图摆脱对微软依赖的德国联邦州

在各国领导人日益主张欧洲减少对美国科技巨头的依赖之际,追求“数字主权”的努力使得石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州成为欧洲的一块“试验田”。

FT社评:价格管制重返主流令人不安

价格管制虽然能带来短期纾困,但也会衍生新的问题。与其关注价格管制,各国政府不如把重点放在提高生产率上。

元首关系紧张,美英安全合作出现裂痕

英美围绕伊朗战争出现分歧,正在冲击两国外交人员、官员以及军方人员之间的工作关系。

FT社评:全球贸易保卫战中的“中间力量缺位”

有关取代美国、寻找多边体系之锚的讨论没有得出什么实际成果。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×