Why California’s plan to tax billionaires is misguided - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
税收

Why California’s plan to tax billionaires is misguided

In America’s federal system, the rich can easily shift to more competitive states
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":8.54,"text":"As cash-strapped US states look to plug holes in their budgets, plans to raise taxes on the super-wealthy are gaining support. The most prominent is California’s proposal for a “one-time” 5 per cent tax on the total wealth of residents with a net worth of $1bn or more, which could go to a ballot in November. Elsewhere, New York mayor Zohran Mamdani has threatened higher property taxes if state legislators do not approve his proposed levy on millionaires. Virginia, Washington and Rhode Island are also weighing raids on the rich. Targeting the well-heeled has political appeal, particularly given the soaring wealth of elites and the cost-of-living concerns of the rest of the population. But these measures will do more harm than good. "}],[{"start":56.08,"text":"In America’s competitive federal model, the rich can quickly up sticks and take their business with them. This should give pause to states such as California and New York, where public finances depend on a narrow band of top taxpayers. Wealthy residents contribute revenue directly through income, capital gains and property taxes, and also through the profit, investment and jobs they generate. This is why Gavin Newsom, California’s Democratic governor, opposes the proposal on billionaires."}],[{"start":91.53,"text":"For measure, the top 0.1 per cent of earners in the Golden State contribute over a sixth of its income tax receipts. This concentration makes revenue acutely sensitive to migration and market swings. At least half a dozen billionaires reportedly left the state just ahead of the wealth tax’s proposed residency cut-off date of January 1 this year. These include Peter Thiel, David Sacks and Sergey Brin. "}],[{"start":120.66,"text":"More could follow. The tax’s residency deadline date faces legal challenges and could be changed, granting others time to move. The wealthy, billionaires or otherwise, will also be aware that their conspicuous riches will continue to make them a target and that the proposal, if passed, sets a precedent for future tax grabs. "}],[{"start":143.75,"text":"Lawmakers must also evaluate wealth levies with their state’s broader appeal in mind. Though California and New York retain strong advantages, given their talent and investor pools, no US state can rest on its laurels, particularly when others are actively trying to lure wealth creators. (Texas and Florida charge no personal income tax)."}],[{"start":168.2,"text":"California, for instance, already leads the nation for the number of regulatory restrictions, and has among the highest tax rates and living costs. As such, over the past decade, it has haemorrhaged companies and talent to lower-tax, lighter-regulation states. Companies including Charles Schwab, Palantir and Tesla have shifted their headquarters elsewhere. In turn, between 2011 and 2021, California lost $102bn in net adjusted gross income to interstate migration, according to the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. "}],[{"start":206.67999999999998,"text":"Rather than relying on wealth taxes, states should focus on improving competitiveness and fiscal resilience. In California, streamlining regulations and speeding up permitting would support growth, and future tax take. Tighter oversight of public spending would also reduce waste. California ranks among America’s highest spenders on welfare, education and health per capita, and is projected to run annual deficits exceeding $20bn until 2030. "}],[{"start":240.86999999999998,"text":"There are more efficient ways of raising tax from billionaires: loopholes such as the stepped-up basis for inherited assets, which enables the wealthy to limit tax liabilities by borrowing against unrealised gains, warrant reform to ensure fairness. "}],[{"start":257.2,"text":"Budgetary stability comes from broadening prosperity, not narrowing the numbers footing the bill. If the biggest contributors leave, others pay the price. In America’s borderless economy, states that toy with wealth taxes do so at their peril."}],[{"start":285.49,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1773028730_7147.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:铸犁为剑——给欧洲工业吹响的战斗号角

在重整军备的推动下,汽车制造商迎来了革新其生产线的又一次机遇。

为何仍应看多黄金?

库珀:尽管这种贵金属在中东战争期间遭到抛售,但其前景仍更为乐观。

试图摆脱对微软依赖的德国联邦州

在各国领导人日益主张欧洲减少对美国科技巨头的依赖之际,追求“数字主权”的努力使得石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州成为欧洲的一块“试验田”。

FT社评:价格管制重返主流令人不安

价格管制虽然能带来短期纾困,但也会衍生新的问题。与其关注价格管制,各国政府不如把重点放在提高生产率上。

元首关系紧张,美英安全合作出现裂痕

英美围绕伊朗战争出现分歧,正在冲击两国外交人员、官员以及军方人员之间的工作关系。

FT社评:全球贸易保卫战中的“中间力量缺位”

有关取代美国、寻找多边体系之锚的讨论没有得出什么实际成果。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×