Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
专栏 凯文•沃什

Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed

The presumptive next chair might be better than others on the list, but he is a confusing, perhaps confused, figure
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.19,"text":"If confirmed as chair of the Federal Reserve, is Kevin Warsh going to be an inflation hawk or Donald Trump’s poodle? His repeated statements on monetary policy and the broader obligations of the Fed suggest the former. But his more recent statements on the inflation outlook and the fact that Trump chose him very much suggest the latter. More broadly, is he a man of conviction and judgment or is he a weathervane, blowing with the wind from the Republican side of politics and so in favour of loose monetary policy when Republicans are in power and of tight money when the Democrats are?"}],[{"start":47.54,"text":"Warsh’s words indicate that he is very much the “hard money” central banker. Notably, in a speech to the Shadow Open Market Committee in New York given in March 2010, when the US economy was, remember, still struggling with the deeply recessionary aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, he had already started worrying about Fed credibility."}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":71.62,"text":"He made four main points. First, Fed independence applies only to monetary policy, not “regulatory policy, consumer protection or other responsibilities granted to the Federal Reserve”. Second, the “Fed, as first-responder, must strongly resist the temptation to be the ultimate rescuer”. Third, “governments may be tempted to influence the central bank to keep monetary policy looser longer to finance the debt and stimulate activity”. But the “only popularity central bankers should seek, if at all, is in the history books”. Last, “central banks, here and abroad, have worked for decades to get inflation down to levels consistent with price stability. We should not risk these hard-won gains.”"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":118.95,"text":"Intellectually, at least, today’s Warsh appears the same as the one of 2010. In his IMF lecture delivered in April 2025, he stressed not only the Fed’s “institutional drift”, but also its recent “failure to satisfy an essential part of its statutory remit, price stability. It has also contributed to an explosion of federal spending. And the Fed’s outsized role and underperformance have weakened the important and worthy case for monetary policy independence.” He made other criticisms, the most pointed being that “the Fed has been the most important buyer of US Treasury debt — and other liabilities backed by the US government — since 2008”. He asserts: “Fiscal dominance — where the nation’s debts constrain monetary policymakers — was long thought by economists to be a possible end-state. My view is that monetary dominance — where the central bank becomes the ultimate arbiter of fiscal policy — is the clearer and more present danger.” For Warsh, then, easy money is the road to ruin."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":187.13,"text":"So what has persuaded Trump, who is fiscal dominance incarnate, and has been berating poor Jay Powell as a “jerk” for not cutting interest rates faster, to appoint Warsh chair, apart maybe from his good looks? One reason might be that he likes Warsh’s hostility to the Fed’s “woke” over-reach. Another might be that he likes his inclination towards financial deregulation. Yet another might be that he is a relatively orthodox choice, whose appointment should calm nervous markets (as it has, so far). But a crucial point must be that Warsh has conveniently concluded that inflation is no longer a threat, because of technology-fuelled productivity growth. That might even be right. As Warsh notes, Alan Greenspan made a similar bet about the impact of the internet in the 1990s. But it is a bold leap for a man who feared inflation back in 2010, in the midst of a deep slump. If he got his way, he would be replacing the “data-dependency” of the Fed with a hunch. Given the huge US fiscal deficits and debts and the US economy’s fast growth, that would be a big gamble."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Column chart of US government balance as a % of GDP showing US federal deficits are still very high as a share of GDP
"}],[{"start":256.66999999999996,"text":"How then might the choice of Warsh play out? I actually agree with some of Warsh’s criticisms of the Fed, notably over its drift into areas that are not part of its core functions. I agree, too, that the post-pandemic inflation was in part its fault: together with other central banks, it failed even to consider that the jump in the money supply in 2020 might lead to a jump in the price level. I also agree with Warsh that the backward-looking monetary policy framework introduced in 2020 was a conceptual and practical error (not to mention grossly mistimed)."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Line chart of Federal Reserve assets, as % of GDP showing The Fed’s balance sheet has already fallen a long way from its peak
"}],[{"start":296.4,"text":"It is comforting, too, to note that the Fed is an institution. The Fed is far more than the chair. Its leadership matters hugely. But Warsh would be unable to ride roughshod over other members of the Federal Open Market Committee or even its staff, at least in the short run."}],[{"start":316.83,"text":"Yet worries remain, on two fronts. The first is that Warsh might be far too willing to argue for whatever Trump wants, even though this would mean accepting fiscal dominance, in spades. It also appears that he intends to justify doing so by offsetting lower short-term rates with higher longer-term ones, as the Fed’s balance sheet is aggressively shrunk. At the same time, the US Treasury is likely to shift further towards short-term financing. With a more strongly upward-sloping US yield curve, the likely outcome would be greater demand for dollar financing at the short end, and less demand at the long end. Above all, given the decline in banks’ reserves and financial deregulation as well, the balance sheets of the financial sector would become more fragile. The incentive to hold the dollar might also fall, as short rates decline and fear of inflation jumps. The result might be another financial crisis."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Column chart of Federal debt as % of GDP, by holder showing US federal debt is back to 1946 levels relative to GDP
"}],[{"start":372.72999999999996,"text":"Yes, Warsh is a better candidate than many of the others on the list. But he is a confusing, perhaps confused, figure. The US and the world need a Fed chair who will stand up to Trump. To his credit, Powell has proved himself to be such a man. Will Warsh?"}],[{"start":401.12999999999994,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1770366503_4639.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

油价涨到每桶100美元,会加速电动汽车转型吗?

随着燃油价格攀升、前景愈发不确定,汽车选购与制造的经济账已难以忽视。

Lex专栏:铸犁为剑——给欧洲工业吹响的战斗号角

在重整军备的推动下,汽车制造商迎来了革新其生产线的又一次机遇。

为何仍应看多黄金?

库珀:尽管这种贵金属在中东战争期间遭到抛售,但其前景仍更为乐观。

试图摆脱对微软依赖的德国联邦州

在各国领导人日益主张欧洲减少对美国科技巨头的依赖之际,追求“数字主权”的努力使得石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州成为欧洲的一块“试验田”。

FT社评:价格管制重返主流令人不安

价格管制虽然能带来短期纾困,但也会衍生新的问题。与其关注价格管制,各国政府不如把重点放在提高生产率上。

元首关系紧张,美英安全合作出现裂痕

英美围绕伊朗战争出现分歧,正在冲击两国外交人员、官员以及军方人员之间的工作关系。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×