Open source could pop the AI bubble — and soon - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

Open source could pop the AI bubble — and soon

Valuations rest on the incorrect assumption that frontier model creators have built massive, durable moats
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.24,"text":"The writer is an open-internet activist and president of the Mozilla Foundation"}],[{"start":11.18,"text":"We cannot go a day without people asking: when will the artificial intelligence bubble pop and what will be the cause? I increasingly think that open-source AI models may be the pin that pops the bubble. "}],[{"start":25.91,"text":"Current AI valuations assume massive, durable moats. Investors have priced in the assumption that only a few companies can build frontier AI models, allowing them to extract monopoly rents. "}],[{"start":40.75,"text":"But if open-source models can match the performance of closed models at a fraction of the cost, that assumption collapses. Think about the billions of dollars in venture investment in OpenAI and Anthropic — as well as internal investment at Google. If the market realises that closed models may be good for cutting-edge research but unnecessary for most AI applications, valuations plummet."}],[{"start":71.18,"text":"A recent study by MIT economist Frank Nagle shows exactly how good open AI models have become. They are on average six times cheaper to use than equivalent closed models. And they are narrowing the performance gap within a few months of each new closed-model release. The speed of this catch-up cycle is accelerating."}],[{"start":95.26,"text":"If users were to choose the best observable AI model based on both price and performance they could save $20bn-$48bn a year.  "}],[{"start":106.26,"text":"Of course, both OpenAI and Google also developed open models — free to use and somewhat flexible. But these often feel like side projects. They are unlikely to win market share unless the companies put more work into them."}],[{"start":122.30000000000001,"text":"The companies that are leading in open-source AI are Chinese. Models by DeepSeek and Alibaba regularly excel in widely used AI benchmarks. A recent study by MIT and developer platform Hugging Face showed a steep decline in the market share of open models from Google, Meta and OpenAI, and a sharp increase in the use of models like DeepSeek and Qwen."}],[{"start":150.25,"text":"Western companies and research labs are hot on their heels. French start-up Mistral has released all of its new models as open source. Mistral Large 3 debuted at number two among open-source non-reasoning models on the LMArena leaderboard, within striking distance of its Chinese competitors. And Seattle-based lab Ai2 released a new set of its Olmo models as truly open — meaning every step of the development pipeline was exposed, from the underlying training data to the parameters that define the model’s output. The extra flexibility and utility this creates are very useful for developers building apps and services on top of AI models."}],[{"start":193.8,"text":"What’s interesting — and worrisome — is that governments are moving to invest huge amounts in closed-model AI. European countries — and those like Canada, where I come from — talk a great deal about tech sovereignty and using AI to drive economic growth. Yet they seem to be ignoring the fact that leaning into open source could get them to these goals faster and cheaper than backing large tech companies."}],[{"start":220.55,"text":"More consequentially, whether governments integrate open-source AI models into their plans could be a major driver in whether they are winners or losers in the AI race over the long run. "}],[{"start":234.13000000000002,"text":"The tipping point could come soon. When a major enterprise announces that it’s switching from a closed model to an open alternative — or when a breakout consumer app is built on a truly open model — investors will realise that the game has changed.  "}],[{"start":250.72000000000003,"text":"The next question is: who will be the winners when the bubble pops? If the dotcom crash is anything to go by it could be the open-source AI model creators. The free, open-source operating system Linux — on which 90 per cent of the public cloud runs today — proved resilient in the aftermath of that crash. The same pattern could be repeated today. The companies with lower valuations now could have significant upside tomorrow."}],[{"start":288.88,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1766445521_9780.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

停车场破产警示热衷售后回租的零售商

那些将旗下物业售后回租的英国超市,应当从NCP的倒闭中汲取教训。

油价涨到每桶100美元,会加速电动汽车转型吗?

随着燃油价格攀升、前景愈发不确定,汽车选购与制造的经济账已难以忽视。

Lex专栏:铸犁为剑——给欧洲工业吹响的战斗号角

在重整军备的推动下,汽车制造商迎来了革新其生产线的又一次机遇。

为何仍应看多黄金?

库珀:尽管这种贵金属在中东战争期间遭到抛售,但其前景仍更为乐观。

试图摆脱对微软依赖的德国联邦州

在各国领导人日益主张欧洲减少对美国科技巨头的依赖之际,追求“数字主权”的努力使得石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州成为欧洲的一块“试验田”。

FT社评:价格管制重返主流令人不安

价格管制虽然能带来短期纾困,但也会衍生新的问题。与其关注价格管制,各国政府不如把重点放在提高生产率上。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×