AI poses a new antitrust problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

AI poses a new antitrust problem

Washington cheered on the consolidation of the social web in the 2010s — it must not make the same mistake today
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

By taking controlling stakes in AI companies, hyperscalers are ensuring that the industry evolves in a way that serves their infrastructure
"}],[{"start":6.69,"text":"The writer is former associate director for litigation in the FTC’s Bureau of Competition and co-founder of Simonsen Sussman"}],[{"start":15.830000000000002,"text":"I joined the Federal Trade Commission in the summer of 2021, just weeks after a federal judge dismissed the agency’s antitrust complaint against Facebook. It was a frantic, all-hands-on-deck moment. I was thrown into a room with lawyers and economists and tasked with keeping the case alive."}],[{"start":36.91,"text":"We rewrote the complaint, which challenged Facebook’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014 respectively. Even then we were well aware of how late it was. If the FTC eventually won at trial (which, spoiler, it did not), the appeals process and complexity of unwinding these companies meant that a remedy might not arrive until 2029 — 17 years after the first acquisition."}],[{"start":67.21,"text":"Last month, Judge James Boasberg ruled that Meta was not a monopoly. The decision highlighted the difficulty that regulators around the world have in challenging acquisitions long after their completion."}],[{"start":81.6,"text":"Yet when Facebook made these purchases, regulators offered little pushback. This reflected a broader pathology at the time. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the American economy seemed precarious. Against that backdrop, Silicon Valley offered a glimmer of hope. Companies like Facebook and Google were viewed as national champions. CEOs were paraded through the White House, treated as dignitaries of a new economic order."}],[{"start":113,"text":"We are now watching history repeat itself. Just as the government cheered on the consolidation of the social web in the 2010s, Washington is offering similar support today for the “hyperscalers” — Microsoft, Amazon and Google — to position themselves as guardians of artificial intelligence. Despite tough rhetoric, the administration is not pushing back on AI deals. We saw this recently when the Department of Justice cleared Google’s acquisition of cloud security company Wiz, waving through further consolidation in the cloud security market. Similarly, the regulatory response to the $38bn cloud deal between Amazon and OpenAI — an arrangement that binds the most prominent AI start-up to a dominant cloud incumbent — has been muted."}],[{"start":166.03,"text":"Such deals are fraught with conflict of interest. By taking controlling stakes in AI companies, hyperscalers are ensuring that the industry evolves in a way that serves their infrastructure and increases the moats around their lines of business. They have every incentive to direct innovation towards massive, data-hungry, compute-inefficient models rather than efficient, decentralised systems."}],[{"start":192.73,"text":"Yet instead of scrutiny, we are seeing a pilgrimage of AI CEOs to the White House. Proposals for a moratorium on state AI laws have been made. This is the language of antitrust amnesty. It suggests that, once again, economic uncertainty is leading Washington to trade competition for the pursuit of international corporate leadership."}],[{"start":216.26999999999998,"text":"The contrast between the current administration and the previous one is stark. When Nvidia attempted to acquire Arm in 2020 — a deal that would have locked down the fundamental architecture of chips used for AI — the FTC sued to block it and the deal was abandoned. Because Arm remained independent, Google is now able to compete with Nvidia in the production of AI chips, using Arm’s technology to build its own processors.  "}],[{"start":247.74999999999997,"text":"Regulators waited too long to address the danger that Facebook’s acquisitions posed to competition. This should be a wake-up call for the AI era. If we allow hyperscalers to devour the AI ecosystem under the guise of national competition, we will be left with a tech sector that is more centralised and more extractive than the one we have today. By the time it is a problem, it may once again be too late to change."}],[{"start":283.82,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1765248116_1543.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

停车场破产警示热衷售后回租的零售商

那些将旗下物业售后回租的英国超市,应当从NCP的倒闭中汲取教训。

油价涨到每桶100美元,会加速电动汽车转型吗?

随着燃油价格攀升、前景愈发不确定,汽车选购与制造的经济账已难以忽视。

Lex专栏:铸犁为剑——给欧洲工业吹响的战斗号角

在重整军备的推动下,汽车制造商迎来了革新其生产线的又一次机遇。

为何仍应看多黄金?

库珀:尽管这种贵金属在中东战争期间遭到抛售,但其前景仍更为乐观。

试图摆脱对微软依赖的德国联邦州

在各国领导人日益主张欧洲减少对美国科技巨头的依赖之际,追求“数字主权”的努力使得石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州成为欧洲的一块“试验田”。

FT社评:价格管制重返主流令人不安

价格管制虽然能带来短期纾困,但也会衍生新的问题。与其关注价格管制,各国政府不如把重点放在提高生产率上。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×