Fuel to Air India 171’s engines was cut off seconds before fatal crash, report says - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Fuel to Air India 171’s engines was cut off seconds before fatal crash, report says

Preliminary findings recommend ‘no actions’ against Boeing or GE Aerospace over incident

The engines on Air India flight 171 briefly cut off seconds after take-off, a preliminary report into the jet’s fatal June 12 crash has found.

India’s Air Accident Investigation Bureau said in its report that the aircraft reached the necessary speed to lift off, but that seconds later switches that control the flow of fuel to the jet’s two engines “transitioned” from “run” to “cut-off” position.

In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other “why did you cut off?” to which he responded “that he did not do so”, the report said.

Although the two switches transitioned back to the “run” position between 10 and 14 seconds later, the engines had been starved of fuel and lost thrust, leading one pilot to declare “mayday, mayday, mayday”.

The AAIB said that at this stage of its investigation there were “no recommended actions” to Boeing, the aircraft manufacturer, or GE Aerospace, whose engines powered the plane.

Air India flight 171 crashed on June 12 seconds after take-off from Ahmedabad, bound for London Gatwick airport, in India’s worst aviation disaster in almost three decades and the industry’s deadliest in 11 years. 

The accident killed 241 people on board and another 29 on the ground, where the Boeing Dreamliner 787-8 crashed into a medical college near the airport.

The preliminary findings, which are based on data drawn from the cockpit voice and digital flight data recorders as well as evidence gathered from the crash site, did not draw any final conclusions about what led to the switches being turned off.

Aviation experts have said it is difficult for pilots to inadvertently move the fuel switches.

Closed-circuit television footage from the airport showed that the jet’s ram air turbine, a device that can provide emergency power for events such as electrical or engine failure, had been deployed, the report said. The jet had already begun to lose altitude before it crossed the airport boundary.

Boeing and GE Aerospace did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In a social media post, Air India said it would continue to work closely with AAIB and other authorities on the ongoing investigation. Indian conglomerate Tata Group, which owns the airline, referred reporters to the statement from Air India.

Sumeet Sabharwal, the captain, had more than 11,500 hours of flying experience, while first officer Clive Kunder had more than 3,400 hours. The report said both pilots had an “adequate rest period” prior to operating the flight.

It also said there was “no significant bird activity” in the vicinity of the flight path.

The report mentioned a 2018 airworthiness bulletin by the US Federal Aviation Administration of “potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature” on Boeing 737s, a smaller model.

The report said the locking mechanism was similar on various Boeing aeroplane models, including certain 787s. It added that Air India did not inspect its planes’ switches because the FAA advisory was not mandatory. It was not immediately clear if there was a link to the accident.

The crash was the first fatal accident involving a Dreamliner. The wide-body 787, used for long-haul flights, is Boeing’s most advanced model and includes lightweight composite materials that aid fuel efficiency.

The company has delivered more than 1,100 of the best-selling aircraft to airline customers.

The UK’s Air Accident Investigation Branch and the US National Transportation Safety Board have assisted India’s AAIB with the investigation into the crash.

The accident is the biggest crisis in the three and a half years since Tata bought the airline from state ownership and sought to revive the brand many Indians once saw as a national embarrassment.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

风向逆转:生活成本负担能力问题让特朗普陷入困境

美国总统将生活成本负担能力问题斥为“骗局”,遭遇民众的强烈反弹。

低增长已成为欧洲最大的金融稳定风险

欧洲最大的金融稳定风险已不再是银行,而是低增长本身。只有实现更强劲的增长,欧洲才能保持安全、繁荣与战略自主。

好莱坞导演罗伯•莱纳夫妇遇害,儿子尼克被捕

洛杉矶警方正在调查《摇滚万万岁》导演罗伯•莱纳遇害一案。莱纳生前除影坛成就外,也因长期投身民权事业而备受政界与娱乐圈人士称赞。
1天前

“稳定币超级周期”为什么可能重塑银行业?

一些技术专家认为,未来五年内,稳定币支付系统的数量将激增至十万种以上。

一周展望:英国央行会在圣诞节前降息吗?

与此同时,投资者一致认为,欧洲央行本周将把基准利率维持在2%。而推迟发布的美国就业数据将揭示美国劳动力市场处于何种状态。

“布鲁塞尔效应”如何适得其反

曾被视为全球典范的欧盟立法机器,如今却在自身抱负的重压下步履蹒跚。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×