Nippon’s bid for US Steel in Joe Biden’s hands after panel vetting deal deadlocked - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
日本制铁

Nippon’s bid for US Steel in Joe Biden’s hands after panel vetting deal deadlocked

President has already voiced opposition to Japanese company’s takeover plan
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":14.06,"text":"A US panel vetting Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of US Steel has been unable to agree on whether President Joe Biden should support the $15bn deal, making it more likely that he will block it during his last weeks in office. "}],[{"start":26.67,"text":"The Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (Cfius) reported to the White House on Monday that the nine agencies on the panel had not reached consensus that the deal posed no security risks, according to Nippon Steel and a person familiar with the matter. "},{"start":40.474000000000004,"text":"Monday was the deadline for Cfius to make a decision. "}],[{"start":44.94,"text":"The lack of agreement puts the decision on a combination — which was agreed more than a year ago — in the hands of Biden, who has already voiced opposition to the Japanese company’s takeover plan and is widely expected to block it. "}],[{"start":57.28,"text":"Doing so would have been more difficult for the president to justify if Cfius had concluded that a takeover did not pose any national security concerns. "}],[{"start":65.72,"text":"Under the rules, the president has 15 days to make a decision or extend the timeline, which could hand the responsibility to Donald Trump, who has also publicly opposed the bid. "}],[{"start":75.62,"text":"The deal’s collapse could shake faith in the strength of the most important alliance between the US and an Asia-Pacific country, and risk revealing the shortcomings of a national security process that has become highly politicised, according to government officials on both sides. "}],[{"start":89.74000000000001,"text":"The inter-agency investment screening body said allowing a Nippon Steel takeover of US Steel could result in lower domestic steel production, posing “a national security risk”, according to the person familiar with its conclusion. "}],[{"start":102.68,"text":"Nippon Steel confirmed that Cfius had referred the decision to the US president after failing to reach consensus. "}],[{"start":110.01,"text":"The company urged Biden to “reflect on the great lengths that we have gone to address any national security concerns”. "}],[{"start":116.14,"text":"It added that it had made commitments to “grow US Steel, protect American jobs and strengthen the entire steel industry” and it was confident that the transaction should be accepted “if it is fairly evaluated on its merits”. "}],[{"start":127.76,"text":"The Cfius committee was split on whether the remedies proposed by Nippon Steel to guarantee these outcomes, such as appointing US citizens to top management and board positions, would be enough, the person familiar with the outcome said. "}],[{"start":141.33,"text":"A White House spokesperson said: “We received the Cfius evaluation and the president will review it. ”"}],[{"start":147.99,"text":"The US Treasury, which chairs the Cfius panel, referred questions to the White House. "}],[{"start":153.83,"text":"The Financial Times previously reported that the main source of opposition to the deal in the Cfius panel came from Katherine Tai, the US trade representative, even though agencies on the panel had concluded that the acquisition of the iconic American steel producer posed no security risks. "}],[{"start":169.65,"text":"Nippon Steel has left the door open for a legal battle with the US government should the deal get rejected. "}],[{"start":176.04,"text":"Takahiro Mori, vice-president at Nippon Steel, had been on a last-minute charm offensive, flying between Washington and Pennsylvania in recent weeks to try to win over policymakers and steelworkers. "}],[{"start":187.93,"text":"A key obstacle has been fierce opposition from United Steelworkers, a powerful trade union led by David McCall, who is close to Biden. "}],[{"start":195.41,"text":""}]],"url":"https://creatives.ftmailbox.cn/album/186269-1735016140.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国打击伊朗花了多少钱?

据估算,自特朗普2月下旬下令美军发动打击以来的五周里,对伊行动的成本为223亿至310亿美元。

伊朗战争能扭转斯塔默的政治命运吗?

时任英国首相戈登•布朗对金融危机的应对让其政治生涯重焕生机,这或许能为陷入困境的现任英国首相提供范本。

乌克兰无人机削弱了俄罗斯因战争获得的石油暴利

俄罗斯受阻的能源出口使得本已因伊朗冲突而动荡的金融市场进一步承压。

FT社评:英国需要拿出一套国防投资方案

计划一再推迟,正引发合作伙伴担忧,并可能导致关键技术流失。

AI担忧与战争冲击交易活动,私募股权收购大幅下滑

截至3月的三个月内,私募股权集团达成的收购交易总额为1720亿美元,较前一季度下降36%。

摩根大通CEO警告私募信贷损失将超出预期

摩根大通掌门人杰米•戴蒙在年度致股东信中称,几乎各个领域的信贷标准都在小幅走弱。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×