Year in a word: X - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 马斯克

Year in a word: X

With Elon Musk at its helm, there is no telling where the revamped platform will be in a year’s time

Elon Musk announced in July that Twitter and it’s bird logo would be rebranded X

(letter, posing as noun) a frightful kind of online open-mic night, owned and dominated by Elon Musk

One of the (many) maddening things about it is that it’s not even an actual word. And yet on July 23 it was thrust upon us as one, when Elon Musk suddenly announced that the social media platform he had bought the previous year was now called X. A new black-and-white logo, designed by a fan, popped up in our bookmark bars and collective consciousness.

In 2013, the Oxford English Dictionary broke with protocol when it added “tweet” to its hallowed pages, despite that use of the word having been around for less than 10 years. Yet in the space of a decade, a neologism has become a paleologism.

Twitter as we knew it is officially dead. And with it has gone not just the familiar bird logo, but also a whole lot of Twitter vocab: the tweet has become the much more generic “post”. Gone, too, are the retweet and quote-tweet. Analysts said Musk had wiped up to $20bn off the brand’s value overnight.

The social media platform is not the first of Musk’s babies to use the letter. He has used it as a name for various business ventures — most notably X.com, an online bank he co-founded in 1999 that later merged with another company to become PayPal — as well as for his first child with former girlfriend Grimes.

We might consider a homophone of the letter an apt description of what were once the platform’s biggest advertisers: ex. Corporate giants such as Apple, Disney and IBM all deserted it after Musk endorsed an antisemitic post last month. He later apologised and said he had been misinterpreted, though he also told the exes they could “go fuck” themselves.

So the platform flails on. With Musk at its helm, there’s no telling where it will be in a year’s time. The OED should probably hold off from adding the one-letter word to its pages for now.

jemima.kelly@ft.com

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

贸易战将使硅谷蒙受巨大损失

大型科技公司的利益与将特朗普送入白宫的运动形成了鲜明对比。

特朗普考验美国人对痛苦的态度

这不再只是面包和马戏了。

特朗普的法律攻击威胁到稳健投资的基础

美国企业需要挺身而出,对抗总统对法治的攻击。

乌克兰正在赢得无人机初创企业的竞争

战场上的实验和廉价、智能解决方案的快速发展帮助该国抵御俄罗斯。

如果没有全球美元,美国可能会更好

特朗普的关税政策虽然反复无常且存在缺陷,但世界经济的不平衡确实存在。

从长远来看,股票“总是”更好吗?

在大多数20年期的结果中,股票肯定会胜过乏味的债券,但也有许多情况下它们会输。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×